§ EQUITY
USD

VOO

VANGUARD S&P 500 ETF
· USDMarket cap · Beta ·
LAST · MARKET CLOSE
PREV CLOSE ·
§ 01 · PRICE
Price action
1D5D1M6MYTD1YMAX
OPEN HIGH LOW VOL AVG VOL 52W
EVENTSTODAY · AC · HOLD
§ 02 · AC TAKE
Where we stand
HOLDLAST UPDATED TODAY

VOO is Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF, so analyzing its ownership structure is a bit like analyzing who owns a mirror — the product itself *is* the market, which makes the institutional breakdown here more of a curiosity than a signal.

The passive index slice coming in at just 7.3% might look counterintuitive for an index fund, but remember: most passive investors holding VOO directly *are* the end allocators — they don't show up in 13F filings the same way active managers do. The income-defensive (3.1%) and quality-compounder (2.5%) slices suggest some institutional accounts are using VOO as a core equity allocation within broader strategies, which is pretty standard portfolio plumbing. The tactical macro and deep value presences are negligible at 0.2% and 0.1% respectively — nobody is making a VOO-specific thesis here, they're just parking capital. Institutional pressure sits at a dead neutral 0.00, and the market regime score of 0.14 is about as close to a shrug as the data can produce. For a product tracking 500 of the largest U.S. companies, this is actually appropriate — VOO is a thermometer, not a trade. Worth noting: 13F filings run 45 to 90 days behind reality, and the ownership snapshot here reflects past positioning, not current intent. None of this data predicts where the S&P 500 goes from here — it just describes who was holding the wrapper when the music stopped.

CONVICTION
60/100
TIME HORIZON
6M
Read the full note →

§ 03 · SIGNAL STACK · WHAT THE INPUTS SAY

13F FLOW
13F · most recent quarter
INSIDER
No recent filings
SHORT INT
FINRA · bi-monthly
OPTIONS SKEW
CBOE · 30d
ANALYST
Street consensus
CROWDING
Ownership percentile

§ 04 · FUNDAMENTALS · THE BOOKS

P/EP/S
EV/EBITDAP/B
Revenue (TTM)Rev YoY
Gross marginOp margin
Net incomeFCF
CashDebt
DividendBuybacks 1Y
AC INTELLIGENCE

VOO is Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF, so analyzing its ownership structure is a bit like analyzing who owns a mirror — the product itself *is* the market, which makes the institutional breakdown here more of a curiosity than a signal. That said, the data shows 67.3% of reported ownership falling into an "unclassified" bucket, which likely reflects the massive retail and omnibus account holdings that don't map cleanly onto institutional behavioral categories. Dealer and bank holdings account for 18.5%, consistent with the kind of collateral, hedging, and facilitation activity you'd expect around one of the most liquid ETF products on the planet.

§ 05 · WHO OWNS IT
Top institutional holders
All holders →
FundShares% portΔ Q/Q
Vanguard Group38.2M0.3%+3%
California Public Employees Retirement System31.6M11.3%
RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC25.5M5.0%
Royal Bank of Canada17.5M1.8%
Morgan Stanley IM16.1M0.6%
Bank of America Corp15.5M0.7%+2%
AC INTELLIGENCE

Top institutional owners for VOO as of the most recent 13F window (Dec 2025). Δ Q/Q reflects share-count change vs. the prior filing — positive green means adding, negative red means trimming. Cross-reference with the ownership-mix bars below to see which strategy cohort is driving the flow.

§ 06 · WHO OWNS IT · BY STRATEGY

OTHER67.3% · 3,629 holders
DEALER / BANK18.5% · 28 holders
PASSIVE / INDEX7.3% · 6 holders
INCOME / DEFENSIVE3.1% · 14 holders
QUALITY / COMPOUNDER2.5% · 25 holders
SYSTEMATIC / QUANT1.0% · 6 holders
TACTICAL / MACRO0.2% · 5 holders
DEEP VALUE0.1% · 2 holders
AC INTELLIGENCE

Ownership mix by behavioral cohort. Top bars indicate which style of capital dominates the float — passive indexing, quality compounders, dealer/bank, systematic quant, etc. Big quality-compounder share means concentrated active conviction; heavy passive share means flows are dictated by index rebalances, not fundamentals.

§ 07 · INSIDER ACTIVITY · LAST 180 DAYS

NO INSIDER FILINGS
AC INTELLIGENCE

No Form 4 filings on record for VOO in the last 180 days.

§ 08 · COVERAGE · OUR RECENT NOTES

NO ARTICLES YET
NO ARTICLES YET
NO ARTICLES YET