QQQ
QQQ is one of the most widely held ETFs on the planet, tracking the Nasdaq-100, and its institutional ownership breakdown reflects that sprawling, catch-all reality.
What's mildly interesting is that tactical macro players account for 9.6% of the behavioral breakdown — a meaningful presence for a passive vehicle. This suggests a portion of QQQ's institutional holders are using it as a macro expression tool rather than a long-term holding, which can introduce choppier flows relative to a pure buy-and-hold product. Meanwhile, passive index holders show up at just 0.2%, which sounds counterintuitive for an index ETF but makes sense — true passive managers tend to hold the underlying components, not the wrapper. The institutional pressure score sits at essentially flat (-0.01), and the market regime score mirrors that, both pointing to a broadly neutral environment with no strong directional signal from this data set. Neither aggressive accumulation nor notable distribution appears to be occurring among the 13F filers captured here. As always, the caveats here are real. The 13F data underpinning the behavioral ownership breakdown is filed quarterly and can be 45 to 90 days stale by the time it's visible. The current price showing as $0.00 also suggests a data feed issue, so any intraday context is missing entirely. This is a historical snapshot of positioning, not a map of where money is heading next.
§ 03 · SIGNAL STACK · WHAT THE INPUTS SAY
§ 04 · FUNDAMENTALS · THE BOOKS
| P/E | — | P/S | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | P/B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | Rev YoY | — |
| Gross margin | — | Op margin | — |
| Net income | — | FCF | — |
| Cash | — | Debt | — |
| Dividend | — | Buybacks 1Y | — |
QQQ is one of the most widely held ETFs on the planet, tracking the Nasdaq-100, and its institutional ownership breakdown reflects that sprawling, catch-all reality. The largest slice — 56.5% — sits in the "unclassified" bucket, which isn't surprising for a product this ubiquitous. It gets held by endowments, pension funds, family offices, and retail aggregators in ways that don't fit neatly into behavioral categories. The next meaningful chunk belongs to systematic quant strategies at 16.3%, followed by dealer and bank desks at 14.7%, which likely reflects hedging activity and structured product positioning rather than directional conviction.
| Fund | Shares | % port | Δ Q/Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optiver Holding B.V. | 41.4M | 9.5% | −4% |
| Optiver Holding B.V. | 39.8M | 9.1% | +7% |
| JANE STREET GROUP, LLC | 38.1M | 3.5% | — |
| Citadel Advisors | 36.2M | 3.3% | — |
| SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP | 34.1M | 2.4% | — |
| JANE STREET GROUP, LLC | 31.9M | 3.0% | — |
Top institutional owners for QQQ as of the most recent 13F window (Dec 2025). Δ Q/Q reflects share-count change vs. the prior filing — positive green means adding, negative red means trimming. Cross-reference with the ownership-mix bars below to see which strategy cohort is driving the flow.
§ 06 · WHO OWNS IT · BY STRATEGY
Ownership mix by behavioral cohort. Top bars indicate which style of capital dominates the float — passive indexing, quality compounders, dealer/bank, systematic quant, etc. Big quality-compounder share means concentrated active conviction; heavy passive share means flows are dictated by index rebalances, not fundamentals.
§ 07 · INSIDER ACTIVITY · LAST 180 DAYS
No Form 4 filings on record for QQQ in the last 180 days.