VOO
VOO is Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF, so analyzing its ownership structure is a bit like analyzing who owns a mirror — the product itself *is* the market, which makes the institutional breakdown here more of a curiosity than a signal.
The passive index slice coming in at just 7.3% might look counterintuitive for an index fund, but remember: most passive investors holding VOO directly *are* the end allocators — they don't show up in 13F filings the same way active managers do. The income-defensive (3.1%) and quality-compounder (2.5%) slices suggest some institutional accounts are using VOO as a core equity allocation within broader strategies, which is pretty standard portfolio plumbing. The tactical macro and deep value presences are negligible at 0.2% and 0.1% respectively — nobody is making a VOO-specific thesis here, they're just parking capital. Institutional pressure sits at a dead neutral 0.00, and the market regime score of 0.14 is about as close to a shrug as the data can produce. For a product tracking 500 of the largest U.S. companies, this is actually appropriate — VOO is a thermometer, not a trade. Worth noting: 13F filings run 45 to 90 days behind reality, and the ownership snapshot here reflects past positioning, not current intent. None of this data predicts where the S&P 500 goes from here — it just describes who was holding the wrapper when the music stopped.
§ 03 · SIGNAL STACK · WHAT THE INPUTS SAY
§ 04 · FUNDAMENTALS · THE BOOKS
| P/E | — | P/S | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | P/B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | Rev YoY | — |
| Gross margin | — | Op margin | — |
| Net income | — | FCF | — |
| Cash | — | Debt | — |
| Dividend | — | Buybacks 1Y | — |
VOO is Vanguard's S&P 500 ETF, so analyzing its ownership structure is a bit like analyzing who owns a mirror — the product itself *is* the market, which makes the institutional breakdown here more of a curiosity than a signal. That said, the data shows 67.3% of reported ownership falling into an "unclassified" bucket, which likely reflects the massive retail and omnibus account holdings that don't map cleanly onto institutional behavioral categories. Dealer and bank holdings account for 18.5%, consistent with the kind of collateral, hedging, and facilitation activity you'd expect around one of the most liquid ETF products on the planet.
| Fund | Shares | % port | Δ Q/Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group | 38.2M | 0.3% | +3% |
| California Public Employees Retirement System | 31.6M | 11.3% | — |
| RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL INC | 25.5M | 5.0% | — |
| Royal Bank of Canada | 17.5M | 1.8% | — |
| Morgan Stanley IM | 16.1M | 0.6% | — |
| Bank of America Corp | 15.5M | 0.7% | +2% |
Top institutional owners for VOO as of the most recent 13F window (Dec 2025). Δ Q/Q reflects share-count change vs. the prior filing — positive green means adding, negative red means trimming. Cross-reference with the ownership-mix bars below to see which strategy cohort is driving the flow.
§ 06 · WHO OWNS IT · BY STRATEGY
Ownership mix by behavioral cohort. Top bars indicate which style of capital dominates the float — passive indexing, quality compounders, dealer/bank, systematic quant, etc. Big quality-compounder share means concentrated active conviction; heavy passive share means flows are dictated by index rebalances, not fundamentals.
§ 07 · INSIDER ACTIVITY · LAST 180 DAYS
No Form 4 filings on record for VOO in the last 180 days.