Crowded Trades
When everyone's in the same boat.
Q1 2026
All Crowded Trades
| # | Stock | Funds | vs Q-1 | Total $ | Crowding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMZN | 38 | -4 | $435.0B | |
| 2 | GOOGL | 38 | 0 | $405.2B | |
| 3 | META | 37 | +3 | $313.7B | |
| 4 | MSFT | 35 | -3 | $595.6B | |
| 5 | V | 35 | -2 | $118.3B | |
| 6 | GOOG | 34 | +1 | $252.7B | |
| 7 | AAPL | 34 | +1 | $735.8B | |
| 8 | TSM | 34 | -1 | $73.3B | |
| 9 | AVGO | 33 | 0 | $322.1B | |
| 10 | COF | 33 | -2 | $27.4B | |
| 11 | NVDA | 33 | -1 | $880.5B | |
| 12 | SPOT | 32 | -2 | $17.6B | |
| 13 | TMO | 32 | 0 | $41.8B | |
| 14 | CAT | 32 | 0 | $77.2B | |
| 15 | UNP | 32 | -1 | $34.3B | |
| 16 | MA | 32 | -1 | $89.4B | |
| 17 | KO | 32 | 0 | $97.0B | |
| 18 | JPM | 32 | -1 | $177.1B | |
| 19 | BRK/B | 31 | 0 | $132.3B | |
| 20 | DIS | 31 | -1 | $32.5B | |
| 21 | CB | 31 | 0 | $39.2B | |
| 22 | DHR | 31 | 0 | $26.4B | |
| 23 | AXP | 31 | 0 | $84.5B | |
| 24 | MU | 31 | +1 | $95.5B | |
| 25 | MELI | 31 | 0 | $15.1B | |
| 26 | NFLX | 31 | 0 | $105.2B | |
| 27 | LLY | 31 | -1 | $176.8B | |
| 28 | UBER | 31 | -1 | $41.0B | |
| 29 | JNJ | 31 | 0 | $118.1B | |
| 30 | BX | 31 | +1 | $22.0B | |
| 31 | LIN | 31 | +1 | $54.9B | |
| 32 | KKR | 31 | +2 | $15.4B | |
| 33 | UNH | 31 | -4 | $63.1B | |
| 34 | MCD | 31 | 0 | $46.9B | |
| 35 | WMT | 31 | -2 | $101.5B | |
| 36 | TDG | 30 | 0 | $15.0B | |
| 37 | SHW | 30 | -2 | $19.7B | |
| 38 | SE | 30 | -1 | $7.8B | |
| 39 | SPGI | 30 | 0 | $26.1B | |
| 40 | ABT | 30 | 0 | $42.0B | |
| 41 | GS | 30 | -1 | $59.9B | |
| 42 | COST | 30 | -1 | $90.0B | |
| 43 | APO | 30 | +2 | $15.9B | |
| 44 | PGR | 30 | -1 | $27.6B | |
| 45 | PM | 30 | -2 | $58.4B | |
| 46 | TMUS | 30 | 0 | $29.4B | |
| 47 | GE | 30 | -1 | $75.3B | |
| 48 | AON | 30 | -1 | $14.6B | |
| 49 | CMCSA | 30 | -2 | $29.2B | |
| 50 | BAC | 30 | -1 | $90.6B |
Crowding Over Time
Fund count per stock across available quarters (top 5 by current crowding).
Why Crowding Matters
A crowded trade occurs when a large number of institutional investors hold the same position simultaneously. While this can signal strong conviction in a stock's fundamentals, it also creates significant risk: if sentiment shifts, the rush to exit accelerates selling pressure beyond what fundamentals alone would dictate.
The crowding score here reflects how many tracked institutional managers — hedge funds, asset managers, and pension funds with $100M+ in reported AUM — hold a given stock in their 13F filings. A rising fund count quarter-over-quarter indicates increasing institutional consensus. A declining count may signal early de-crowding before a broader exit.
Retail investors can use crowding data as a risk signal: heavily crowded positions carry elevated drawdown risk during market stress events. Conversely, stocks with declining institutional participation may offer contrarian opportunity — or further downside if the thesis is broken.
Based on publicly available 13F filings. Positions reflect quarter-end snapshots and may have changed significantly since filing. Not financial advice. See full disclaimer.