META
META's ownership profile is an interesting mix of conviction and autopilot money.
The institutional pressure score sitting at dead neutral (0.00) and the market regime score barely above zero (0.01) suggests there's no particularly strong directional signal from the smart money flow data right now. Growth and momentum-oriented funds, which tend to chase price action, account for only 0.3% of the breakdown — a notably small figure for a stock that has historically attracted that crowd. Activist ownership is essentially negligible at 0.1%, meaning no one is currently making noise about forcing strategic changes. The standard caveats apply here with some extra weight: 13F filings — the source of institutional ownership data — are filed 45 to 90 days after the fact, meaning what you're looking at is a historical snapshot, not a live picture of who holds what. Short interest data is updated only biweekly. None of this tells you where the stock goes next — it tells you where certain categories of money were parked at some point in the recent past. Historical positioning is a rearview mirror, not a windshield.
§ 03 · SIGNAL STACK · WHAT THE INPUTS SAY
§ 04 · FUNDAMENTALS · THE BOOKS
| P/E | 20.8 | P/S | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | P/B | 7.66 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | Rev YoY | — |
| Gross margin | — | Op margin | — |
| Net income | — | FCF | — |
| Cash | — | Debt | — |
| Dividend | 0.40% | Buybacks 1Y | — |
META's ownership profile is an interesting mix of conviction and autopilot money. Quality compounders — funds that tend to hold concentrated positions in businesses with durable competitive advantages — account for 16.3% of the behavioral ownership breakdown, which is a meaningful chunk and suggests sophisticated long-term money sees the company as a genuine earnings machine rather than a momentum trade. That reading is broadly consistent with a P/E of 20.8, which is relatively modest for a company of this scale and dominance, though a market cap figure of $1,256,447.4 trillion in the source data is almost certainly a formatting error and should be treated as unreliable. Passive index funds make up another 19%, meaning a significant portion of ownership is essentially non-discretionary — those holders aren't making a judgment call on META, they're just tracking a benchmark.
| Fund | Shares | % port | Δ Q/Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group | 178.3M | 1.7% | — |
| State Street | 90.8M | 2.0% | — |
| Fidelity Management | 90.0M | 3.0% | +363% |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 65.0M | 0.7% | — |
| Geode Capital Management | 46.5M | 1.9% | +696% |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 45.3M | 0.5% | — |
Top institutional owners for META as of the most recent 13F window (Dec 2025). Δ Q/Q reflects share-count change vs. the prior filing — positive green means adding, negative red means trimming. Cross-reference with the ownership-mix bars below to see which strategy cohort is driving the flow.
§ 06 · WHO OWNS IT · BY STRATEGY
Ownership mix by behavioral cohort. Top bars indicate which style of capital dominates the float — passive indexing, quality compounders, dealer/bank, systematic quant, etc. Big quality-compounder share means concentrated active conviction; heavy passive share means flows are dictated by index rebalances, not fundamentals.
§ 07 · INSIDER ACTIVITY · LAST 180 DAYS
| Date | Insider | Role | Action | Shares | $ value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUN 17 | Olivan Javier | — | SELL | 83K | −$0 |
| MAR 25 | Olivan Javier | — | SELL | 88K | −$0 |
| MAR 18 | Olivan Javier | — | SELL | 88K | −$0 |
| MAR 18 | KIMMITT ROBERT M | — | SELL | 4K | −$0 |
0 insider buys, 4 sells in the last 180 days. Scheduled 10b5-1 sales are pre-programmed and neutral; discretionary clusters are the tape worth reading. Cross-reference with the signal stack above for context.