ORCL
Oracle's institutional ownership picture is notably fragmented, with no single behavioral category dominating the register.
The institutional pressure score sitting at effectively zero — neutral — indicates that the aggregate buying and selling behavior across these holder types is roughly in balance right now. No cohort appears to be aggressively accumulating or dumping. The market regime score is similarly flat at 0.01, suggesting neither a risk-on nor risk-off environment is driving outsized flows into or out of names like ORCL at this moment. The P/E of 26x is modest relative to pure-play cloud peers, which may partly explain why momentum-chasing strategies haven't piled in. Worth flagging that the market cap figure in the source data ($420,996T) is clearly a data error — Oracle's actual market cap is in the hundreds of billions range, not hundreds of trillions — so treat any ratio analysis derived from that figure with skepticism until confirmed against a clean source. As always, 13F filings that feed institutional ownership data are 45 to 90 days stale by the time they're public, and this snapshot reflects historical positioning, not current intent. Institutions can and do move quickly after these filings drop, so what looks balanced today may already be shifting.
§ 03 · SIGNAL STACK · WHAT THE INPUTS SAY
§ 04 · FUNDAMENTALS · THE BOOKS
| P/E | 26.0 | P/S | — |
| EV/EBITDA | — | P/B | 22.84 |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | Rev YoY | — |
| Gross margin | — | Op margin | — |
| Net income | — | FCF | — |
| Cash | — | Debt | — |
| Dividend | 1.43% | Buybacks 1Y | — |
Oracle's institutional ownership picture is notably fragmented, with no single behavioral category dominating the register. The largest slice is unclassified holders at 14.6%, followed closely by passive index funds at 13.8% — meaning roughly a quarter of tracked institutional ownership is either benchmark-driven or difficult to categorize. Quality compounder strategies hold 9.1%, which suggests some longer-duration money sees Oracle as a durable cash-flow business worth holding through cycles. Dealer and bank desks account for 7.4%, which typically reflects hedging activity or structured product exposure rather than directional conviction. Notably, growth and momentum strategies hold just 0.2%, which is surprisingly thin for a company that has been loudly repositioning itself around cloud infrastructure and AI workloads.
| Fund | Shares | % port | Δ Q/Q |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Group | 157.9M | 0.4% | +3% |
| State Street | 76.5M | 0.5% | — |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 59.4M | 0.2% | — |
| BlackRock, Inc. | 35.5M | 0.1% | +656% |
| Geode Capital Management | 32.9M | 0.4% | +637% |
| Capital Research Global Investors | 30.1M | 1.1% | +29% |
Top institutional owners for ORCL as of the most recent 13F window (Dec 2025). Δ Q/Q reflects share-count change vs. the prior filing — positive green means adding, negative red means trimming. Cross-reference with the ownership-mix bars below to see which strategy cohort is driving the flow.
§ 06 · WHO OWNS IT · BY STRATEGY
Ownership mix by behavioral cohort. Top bars indicate which style of capital dominates the float — passive indexing, quality compounders, dealer/bank, systematic quant, etc. Big quality-compounder share means concentrated active conviction; heavy passive share means flows are dictated by index rebalances, not fundamentals.
§ 07 · INSIDER ACTIVITY · LAST 180 DAYS
| Date | Insider | Role | Action | Shares | $ value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JUN 26 | HENLEY JEFFREY | — | SELL | 0 | −$0 |
0 insider buys, 1 sell in the last 180 days. Scheduled 10b5-1 sales are pre-programmed and neutral; discretionary clusters are the tape worth reading. Cross-reference with the signal stack above for context.